Sunday, November 4, 2012

Looming colder weather adds urgency to recovery efforts in areas hit hard by Superstorm Sandy

{ttle}

{cptn}","template_name":"ss_thmb_play_ttle","i18n":{"end_of_gallery_header":"End of Gallery","end_of_gallery_next":"View Again"},"metadata":{"pagination":"{firstVisible} - {lastVisible} of {numItems}","ult":{"spaceid":"2145868274","sec":""}}},{"id": "hcm-carousel-1247634051", "dataManager": C.dmgr, "mediator": C.mdtr, "group_name":"hcm-carousel-1247634051", "track_item_selected":1,"tracking":{ "spaceid" : "2145868274", "events" : { "click" : { "any" : { "yui-carousel-prev" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"prev","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } }, "yui-carousel-next" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"next","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // no more pages, don't beacon again // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } } } } } } })); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {(function() { try{ if (Math.floor(Math.random()*10) == 1) { var loc = window.location, decoded = decodeURI(loc.pathname), encoded = encodeURI(decoded), uri = loc.protocol + "//" + loc.host + encoded + ((loc.search.length > 0) ? loc.search + '&' : '?') + "_cacheable=1", xmlhttp; if (window.XMLHttpRequest) xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); else xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); xmlhttp.open("GET",uri,true); xmlhttp.send(); } }catch(e){} })(); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings = '"projectId": "10001256862979", "documentName": "", "documentGroup": "", "ywaColo" : "vscale3", "spaceId" : "2145868274" ,"customFields" : { "12" : "classic", "13" : "story" }'; Y.Media.YWA.init(Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {if(document.onclick===YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.newClick){document.onclick=YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.oldClick;} }); }); });

Parents Take Responsibility For Childhood ObesityYour Health ...

From The LA Times?..

Sixty percent of the cause of the rise in childhood obesity rests with the parents, according to parents who took a Yale survey about food marketing. The parents assigned the rest of the cause to an unhealthy food environment.

Parents buy an estimated $58 billion in food and beverages annually, so the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity wanted to know what they thought about marketing to children. It conducted an online survey of 2,454 parents of children ages 2 to 17 in 2009, 2010 and 2011. Their average income was $59,000, and most of them had at least some college education.

The parents cited as the top obstacles to ensuring healthy eating habits: expense (of healthy and organic foods), easy access (to fast food, snack foods and unhealthy food in schools), children?s media usage and advertising. They also said they gave in to their kids? requests and were not always good role models for eating.

Asked what foods their kids have seen or heard marketing about, fast food was in the top two all three years. Soda, which some public officials say bears a big responsibility for obesity, came in third each year.

The parents expressed moderate concern (6.6 to 7.9 on a scale of 10) about most youth-oriented media issues. Their concerns, in order of importance: sexual permissiveness, materialism, violence, too-thin models. In the middle of the list were ?encourages children to want/buy products,? marketing of junk food to children and encouragement of bad eating habits. Tobacco and alcohol got similar scores.

?Food marketing to children isn?t exactly the foremost thing on parents? minds,? said Elaine Kalish, vice president and director for children?s food and beverage advertising at the Better Business Bureau.

In this report and others, Rudd Center officials have said the food industry could do more to ensure healthful diets for kids.

To read the full story?..Click here

Source: http://www.lensaunders.com/wp/?p=6108

double fine adventure turbo tax katharine mcphee cold mountain valentines day ideas the villages florida egoraptor

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Evan Rachel Wood: I'm married but bisexual

John Sciulli / Getty Images

Evan Rachel Wood and Jamie Bell married on Oct. 30.

By Us Weekly

Just one day after??Evan Rachel Wood?and?Jamie Bell?tied the knot in California, the 25-year-old actress took to?Twitter?to answer a fan's question about her sexual orientation.?

"Honestly not trying to be an (expletive). Just trying to understand," one user wrote. "Does this mean you are not bi anymore? How does that work?"?

"No," Wood replied Oct. 31. "It just means I am not single anymore."?

PHOTOS: Out and proud LGBT celebs?

Wood first opened up about being bisexual in a 2011?interview with?Esquire. "I was always into very androgynous things. Guys, girls . . . I'm into androgyny in general," the "Mildred Pierce" star explained. "I'm more of like the guy when it comes to girls. I'm the dominant one. I'm opening the doors, I'm buying dinner. Yeah, I'm romantic."?

In a?later interview with?Marie?Claire, Wood -- who once played a lesbian vampire queen on HBO's "True Blood" -- said her bisexuality is "a big part of who I am, and it always has been for as long as I can remember. . . I've honestly fallen in love with a man and I've honestly fallen in love with a woman . . . I don't know how you label that, it's just how it is."?

PHOTOS: Famous bridesmaids?

Wood and "Man on a Ledge"?star Bell, 26, met in 2005 as costars in Green Day's "Wake Me Up When September Ends" music video. They soon began dating, and even got matching tattoos in 2006. Though they called it quits after one year together, they reunited in summer of 2011. Bell popped the question in early 2012.?

The couple tied the knot in a small ceremony with close family and friends. The bride wore a custom Chantilly lace mermaid gown by Carolina Herrera with capped-sleeves and striped ribbon waist detail. "I am so happy for Evan, she is a timeless beauty and her gown in Chantilly lace captures this perfectly," the designer told?Us Weekly.?

PHOTOS: Over-the-top celebrity weddings?

On Oct. 31, Wood also retweeted a quote about marriage from the?WOW Facts of Life?account: "They say the wedding ring goes on the left ring finger, because it's the only finger with a vein that connects to the heart." The following day, Bell thanked his?Twitter?followers for their warm wishes. "I'm a lucky man," he wrote.?

Wood called off her wedding plans with rocker?Marilyn Manson?in 2010 after years of on-and-off dating.?

Related content:

Source: http://todayentertainment.today.com/_news/2012/11/02/14886749-evan-rachel-wood-im-still-bisexual-even-though-im-married?lite

cheryl burke sarah burke mega upload santorum wins iowa archer ibooks 2 ifl

The Saturdays Shop In Beverly Hills | Music News, Reviews, and ...

What about The Saturdays? The British girl group was spotted on Friday (November 2) having a little shopping spree in Beverly Hills. The gorgeous fivesome are currently shooting their reality show for E! (premiering January 2013), so the gals have been a bit busy. This week alone they?ve already had a photo shoot for their upcoming album and performed a set L.A.?s The Roxy. We?re lucky these ladies found time for a little retail therapy. See Vanessa, Frankie, Rochelle, Una and Mollie getting their shop on.

Source: http://idolator.com/7246002/the-saturdays-shop-in-beverly-hills

fantasy baseball jared sullinger jaleel white levi johnston 2013 srt viper scott walker recall fisker atlantic

Pew study: Campaign coverage negative overall

By M. Alex Johnson, NBC News

News coverage of the presidential campaign has been consistently negative, media researchers reported Friday, but it's been significantly friendlier to Republican nominee Mitt Romney since he was widely declared to have won his first debate with President Barack Obama in early October.

The report, by the Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism, noted a clear turning point in mainstream news coverage beginning Oct. 4, after Obama appeared subdued and distracted during the previous night's debate in Denver.

Before the debate, 44 percent of news stories about Romney were "negative," as defined by the researchers, compared with 11 percent that were "positive" (the rest were considered neutral). Afterward, only 30 percent of his coverage was negative, while 20 percent was positive.

Coverage of Obama swung the other way in lockstep. Twenty-seven percent of his pre-debate coverage was negative and 22 percent was positive; post-debate, the split was 36 percent negative to only 13 percent positive.


Pew examined and classified major campaign news stories on 11 newspapers' front pages, the 12 largest news websites (including msnbc.com/NBCNews.com), the three broadcast networks, the three cable news networks, and three radio networks, including NPR. "Favorable" and "unfavorable" didn't necessarily mean an individual story made any value judgment about either candidate, Pew said; instead, it could also be a measure of the news in the story, such as another politician's critical remarks.

The survey covered Aug. 27 through Oct. 21. That includes both party nominating conventions but only the first two of the three presidential debates.

Full coverage of Decision 2012 on NBC Politics

For the entire period, coverage broke down this way:

That's a big difference from 2008. More of Obama's coverage was favorable that year than unfavorable, by 36 percent to 29 percent. Republican nominee John McCain's coverage, by contrast, was even more unfavorable than Romney's has been, at 57 percent negative to 14 percent positive.

Pew theorized that the difference could partly be attributed to the economy, which Obama has overseen for four years as president after having been able to run against it in 2008.

A striking conclusion of the survey is that, contrary to popular perception that campaign coverage is dominated by inside baseball (who's up or down in the polls, tactics and the like), there has actually been much less "horse race" coverage this year.

Such coverage ? a perennial target of media scholars and pundits ? has made up only 38 percent of news reports this year, down by 15 percentage points from 2008, when it was a clear majority of all coverage at 53 percent. Pew offered no theories on why.

The study also tried to quantify the ideological divide among the cable networks. According to Pew's analysis, Fox News leaned heavily pro-Romney, while MSNBC leaned even more toward Obama:

(CNN came in somewhat more even-handed. Coverage of Obama was about even, but unfavorable coverage of Romney outweighed favorable coverage by a 3-to-1 ratio.

Two important caveats should be noted:

Pew reports that it reviewed the cable networks for only 4? hours of the day, mainly in the evening, when Fox (Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity) and MSNBC (Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz) schedule programs that are open in their partisanship. The study looked at the networks' dayside programming ? when both networks say they strive for impartiality ? only from 2 to 2:30 p.m. ET.

Nor does it break down how much of the coverage comes from news agencies like The Associated Press and Reuters ? identical versions of which could appear dozens of times across multiple platforms, potentially overweighting their influence.

More coverage from NBCPolitics.com:

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

?

Source: http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/11/02/14861988-pew-study-campaign-coverage-negative-overall-but-romney-boosted-by-first-debate?lite

London 2012 Fencing olympics chariots of fire nbc Medal Count Sam Mikulak London 2012 diving

Friday, November 2, 2012

How you can save a marriage? ? Fruitful Bird

Katie & Callum 188

?I?ve?ogled more weird watermelon-boob brides than you can poke a bonbonniere candy stick at??

Two years ago today, Cal and I made 350 people promise to help us stay married.

Kind of like a pre-nuptial agreement, only you don?t get anything if it doesn?t work out?

To clarify, on our wedding day (30.10.10) we invited our guests to promise to uphold us as we endeavoured to fulfil our covenant vows to each other.

This is a little known and oft misunderstood aspect of the Christian marriage ceremony, but over the last two years I?ve come to value it as one of the most important.

I have attended in the order of 80 -100 weddings over the past 15 years, most of which I have participated in.? Singing, bridesmaid, speeches, MC, general wedding dogsbody, usher, chauffeur, slightly inebriated guest, enthusiastic conga line starter etc.

I have seen every shade of pastel, every shade of purple, more diamantes, eaten more overcooked chicken, witnessed more awkward moments and ogled more weird watermelon-boob brides than you can poke a bonbonniere candy stick at.

I can pretty much recite the ceremony, vows and predict just about every single thing that will happen in a wedding ceremony ? awkward supposed-to-be-funny top tips for marriage read by a poorly prepared groomsman, meaningful bible verse read by a nervous cousin, sappy poem read by a teary sister, profound words offered by Oprah/Maya Angelou/CS Lewis etc.

I know the drill.

But not a lot of people stop and think about the power of what I like to call The People?s Promise (TPP).

?

The People?s Promise

For those of you wondering, the TPP happens after the vows and goes a little something like this:

?Family and friends: Do you pledge your support and encouragement to the covenant commitment X and X have made here today?? Will you uphold them in prayer and love so their marriage will grow strong and bear witness to the love and kindness of God??

With any luck, most people will say ?we do? and mean it.

Because here?s the thing:? Being married to your best friend is ace.? You can have all the romantic kitchen spatula fights you like and make all your single friends simultaneously loathe you and envy you all the same time.? You can buy houses, name your unborn children, go travelling and have all sorts of newlywed adventures, but I can categorically say that it would go to hell in a handcart without TPP.

A big call, I grant you, but hear me out.

Princess Di famously said there were always three people in her marriage but judging by how things turned out, that probably wasn?t enough.

Cal and I have 350 people in ours and things are going swimmingly.? Sure, it gets a little crowded at bedtime, but it?s worth it.

I?m kidding, but what I?m getting at is that the past two years of marriage have taught me that our relationship simply won?t work if it?s just me and Cal.? We are awesome (naturally), but we are not enough for each other.

Anyone waxing romantical, spouting lines like ?you?re all I need? and ?if I have you, I have everything? and ?our love is the fire that keeps me burning? is both extremely annoying, incredibly foolish and/or a liar.

The reality is that if our covenant relationships boiled down solely to a series of interactions between two people, a number of things would happen including ? but not limited to:

  • Boredom
  • Loss of perspective
  • Lack of accountability
  • Settling
  • Insularity

This may sound like a fairly sad indictment on relationships, but we are pack animals; designed for community.? My relationship with Callum is enriching and fruitful because we have invited others to help us be our best for each other.

The boys?

Cal needs time with the boys, time with women who aren?t his wife, and adventures with people other than me.? He needs to learn and grow and be tested without me always factoring in the equation.

And the same is true for me.? We cannot be a sun around which the other is locked in to orbit.? We need to be more of a Milky Way ? a vast expanse of experiences, opportunities and discoveries all headed in the one direction.

the girls verifying my lack of mammaries?

You will never be enough for one person and they will never be enough for you.??

Callum is a better husband for having people in his life who are committed to helping him be the best version of himself.? He is a better husband when he has his own pursuits and his own interests (aka fantasy sport) that have nothing to do with me (and if it?s fantasy sport I can?t even describe how much I don?t want to know about it).

I am a better wife for having people in my life who allow me to experience life in a different context than my marriage.

This isn?t to say that our lives are a completely open book to anyone and everyone, but it?s about us choosing to interact with good people who can stimulate and inspire us, give us fresh perspective, tell us when we?re acting like idiots and encourage us to be better versions of ourselves.

Our marriage is sweeter, more enriching and more intimate because of the people and pursuits we have outside of each other.

And this is why we asked our wedding guests to make TPP.

Not because they have it all together ? like you and me, they are mostly mental ? but because collectively, they add a beautiful perspective, boundary, insight and encouragement that every marriage sorely needs.

So if you are at a wedding ceremony and someone asks you to make TPP, consider it a deep honour.? You will never know how profound an impact your promise will make on a marriage.

Yours on my wedding anniversary, or possibly a few days after depending on when I get around to posting this,

LK x

?

?

?

?

Source: http://fruitfulbird.com/2012/11/02/how-you-can-save-a-marriage/

m i a mia super bowl tom coughlin wes welker eli manning eli manning kelly clarkson national anthem

How To Charge Your Phone and Other Gadgets During a Blackout By...



How To Charge Your Phone and Other Gadgets During a Blackout

By Mario Aguilar

The electricity grid seems like an infallible force, and it?s really wonderfully reliable?-until for whatever reason it lets you down. When the lights go out for more than 24 hours, a healthy charge might be your only way to contact the world outside the darkness.

A blackout doesn?t mean there?s no energy left out in the world. You just need to know where to look?and you need to have the right tools to extract it.